THE AUDITORS INSTITUTE | FORUM

Archived Forums

When you become a member of The Auditors Institute, you immediately gain access to expertise, advocacy for your profession and peace of mind.

Ask a question in our members-only forum or use the search function to find prior technical discussions on your topic. You can expect a response within 24-48hrs.

Want to become a Member?

Join Now

Already a Member?

Disclaimer

The forum is made available by The Auditors Institute Ltd for the benefit of it’s members only, and its primary purpose is to facilitate education, training, and discussion between members. The information and answers provided within the forum are of a general nature and do not consider any specific circumstances, objectives, financial situation or needs related to the matter/s raised. The responses should not be construed as financial advice, and each Member should seek their own professional advice before making any decisions. The Auditors Institute Ltd and its representatives are not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided in the forum.

To test this feature, visit your live site.

Kathryn Carberry

Sep 01, 2022

Leasehold owned by an SMSF

in SMSF Technical Forum

An SMSF where one of the members is a doctor has entered into an arrangement where the SMSF holds the head lease on a building used as a medical centre. The SMSF then has leases in place with various medicos and service providers (eg pathology) The building is owned by an unrelated party.

Is this arrangement ok?

Currently the leasehold is not recorded as an asset of the SMSF. Should a value be accorded to the leasehold in the accounts of the SMSF

3 answers0 replies

Comments (3)

Kathryn Carberry

Sep 01, 2022

To the best of my knowledge the building is NOT owned by a related party

I don't believe there was an acquisition cost for the lease but rather a lease agreement has been entered into between the SMSF and the owner of the premises

The whole of the building is Business Real property

I have requested copies of the head lease and the sub-leases. It may be the case that one of the sub-leases is with a member or associate of the fund

The SMSF receives income from at least 8 separate sub-leases

I believe that the lease should have a value based on future earnings. I am waiting to receive a copy of the lease so as to know the length of the lease and will speak to the accountant regarding valuing the lease

As the head lease is not with a related party I did not think there were NALI and NALE issues but was hoping for some guidance on this

THE AUDITORS INSTITUTE

Sep 01, 2022

Replying to

Hi Kathryn

Thanks, the Fund has leased a property from an unrelated party & then it has on leased the property.

The Fund should be able to do this if it is done on an arm's length / commercial basis & the related party rules are followed. The Fund's investment strategy would need to allow for it & you would have to check that it complies with the sole purpose test.

If it is done on a commercial basis there should not be any NALI / NALE issues.

Yes you would need to look at the lease agreements and net income position and assign a value to holding the head lease.

As I noted I have not come across this before so if any members can give their view that would be appreciated.

Thanks

SMSF AAA