I'm auditing a fund which owns and leases a number of commercial properties. There is no borrowing involved, they are all owned outright by the fund. On one of the title searches I have discovered the following:
---------------------------------
CAVEAT AV.............. 15/12/2021
Caveator
JUDO BANK PTY LTD ACN: 615995581
Grounds of Claim
MORTGAGE OF LEASE WITH THE FOLLOWING PARTIES AND DATE.
Parties
XXXXXXX PTY LTD ACN: XXXXX
Date
01/12/2021
Estate or Interest
INTEREST AS MORTGAGEE
Prohibition
ANY INSTRUMENT THAT AFFECTS MY/OUR INTEREST
Lodged by
GADENS LAWYERS
Notices to
GADENS LAWYERS of LEVEL 13 447 COLLINS STREET MELBOURNE VIC 3000
I haven't seen this before and am concerned that there is a registered encumberance that doesn't relate to a LRBA. Is this a reportable contravention and does it require a qualification in the audit report per regulation 13.14 where a fund must not give a charge over a fund asset?
Is the business in question a pharmacy? It is a very common clause which is essentially a "right to entry" clause on pharmacy loans. I personally dont think SMSF has anything to do with this. The asset being "mortgaged" is the lease on the shop owned by SMSF, NOT on the shop itself. I would agree with what Jason G has said.