In this scenario the SMSF owns a residential property which has an LRBA on it, it is a sole director/member fund. Originally property was leased to 3 unrelated people on separate leases, the SMSF found this too hard to manage so the spouse of the sole member/director started managing it through his rental property management business. This seems OK so far provided it is all arm's length and the business is legitimate. However, now they propose to lease the property directly to the rental property management business who will then on lease to the tenants and manage them directly, collecting income via lease he holds with the tenants, and then pay the SMSF a fixed amount in return which is a slightly lower figure but the SMSF has security of income. My thoughts are this is not going to fly as the residential property is then being leased to a related party and the purpose of use is residential underlying this. Does anyone have thoughts here? Any help greatly appreciated.
top of page
When you become a member of The Auditors Institute, you immediately gain access to expertise, advocacy for your profession and peace of mind.
Ask a question in our members-only forum or use the search function to find prior technical discussions on your topic. You can expect a response within 24-48hrs.
Disclaimer
The forum is made available by The Auditors Institute Ltd for the benefit of it’s members only, and its primary purpose is to facilitate education, training, and discussion between members. The information and answers provided within the forum are of a general nature and do not consider any specific circumstances, objectives, financial situation or needs related to the matter/s raised. The responses should not be construed as financial advice, and each Member should seek their own professional advice before making any decisions. The Auditors Institute Ltd and its representatives are not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided in the forum.
bottom of page
Thanks for your reply :)