TRUST INVESTMENT WITH UNRELATED PARTIES
As we know, Bank Interest is extremely low at present and usually a fully franked dividend may get 4%. I have a client who wants to set up a Unit Trust and use the superfund to hold units in that trust and through that lend to totally unrelated clients and charge approximately 10-15% interest. There may be another unrelated party also to invest in the trust. Would this be a legal investment for the SMSF please?
I agree with the control test of greater than 50% of the unit trust then it becomes a related party. My further concern would be the security the Unit Trust would be getting from the borrower. I would fall back to the sole purpose test. Drawing a long bow, I consider there would be a breach if no real or reliable was security was provided so as to protect the members interest at the end of the day. I have seen in the past similar products (solicitors mortgage ) fail. High returns = high risk.
Hi Roslyn
A SMSF can lend money to an unrelated party. The investment / loan needs to be made on an arm's length basis (section 109 of SIS) & must be in accordance with the Fund's investment strategy.
If the Fund was to invest in a unit trust & the unit trust was to be the lender you would need to make sure the in-house asset (IHA) rules are not breached. As an example if the Fund owned or controlled more than 50% of the units the unit trust would be a related party & the Fund would only be able to invest up to 5% of its assets in the trust (under the IHA rules - refer section 71 of SIS). There are IHA exceptions for ungeared unit trusts but these are for when they invest in property (refer Reg 13.22C of SIS).
Thanks
SMSF AAA