I am auditing a fund that should have obtained an actuarial certificate to calculate tax.
They have not obtained a certificate.
In my calculations, the effect is immaterial from a financial audit perspective. I would still raise the issue in the management letter.
However, would this be a S35c(2) breach for not providing the auditor with the necessary documents to conduct the audit? Or not, because technically no such document exists to provide in the first place?
Thank you
Hi Jason
I have not come across this before. My view is that it is a required document of the audit so section 35C(2) would be qualified on if not provided. I assume some auditors may argue it is not a required document.
Perhaps if the trustee is aware that you will qualify they will provide the actuarial certificate.
If other forum members have a view please let the forum know.
Thanks
The Auditors Institute