Please refer to the diagram below. Could you please suggest how this arrangement can be structured so that there is no breach of the in-house assets rules?
Is there a way that A1 and A2 can be deemed to not control the unit trust?
The Z Unit Trust property has been purchased with this structure today (for example). Could there be an IHA issue for AA Super Fund ?
Will changing the structure of the unit trust (eg. Removing trustee A2) before 30 June 2024 address any IHA issue?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff8b/2ff8b885833f347e044d103100c964dbd4755451" alt=""
Thanks
Hi M.J.
A SMSF can only invest up to 5% of its assets in "in-house assets". In-house assets include a Unit Trust investment where more than 50% is owned or if the entity is considered a controlled trust. I note that there are exceptions to the in-house asset rules for non-geared Unit Trusts but assume in your example you are referring to a geared trust.
Re your questions:
If A1 & A2 are 2 of the 3 trustees of Z Unit Trust this would make it a controlled Trust.
Yes if AA Super Fund invest in Z Unit Trust and it is a controlled trust then this would be an investment in an "in-house asset".
Yes if A2 was not a trustee of the Z Unit Trust you could argue that it is no longer a controlled Trust and no longer an "in-house asset".
A great summary of the "in-house asset" rules re Unit Trusts can be found at:
Thanks
The Auditors Institute